please change this link

Please go to http://themorrisseauhoaxexposedblog.com for the up-to-date content.

Thank you for your patience, and for your interest.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We’re Back…

We’re back…

Just like the Whack-a-Mole, we refuse to stay down…

whackamole2On March 15 our educational blog, which we publish in the public interest, was subjected to two cyber attacks by art terrorists trying to impose a Chill & Kill freeze on our free speech rights, on an issue that is of concern to countless Canadians interested in protecting the integrity of Canada’s fine art and Aboriginal cultural heritage.

The Principal Art Terrorist was The Principal Conspiracy Theorist, AKA Mr. Smith, AKA the Principal Morrisseau Dealer, Donald Robinson. He was supported in his attack by the Junior Conspiracy Theorist, Paul Robinson.

Within five (5) hours, their cyber attack was joined by the Principal Conspiracy Theorist Lawyer, Aaron Milrad.

The attack was two-pronged:

Norval called the Principal Conspiracy Theorist, "The Shark in Still Waters." Principal Morrisseau Dealer AKA Principal Conspiracy Theorist. No matter which disguise he uses, no one in Canadian art history has ever before, so aggressively sought out the media spotlight for himself, by setting out to deliberately place himself, and his Conspiracy Theory about supposed Morrisseau forgeries, at the centre of a public discussion from one end of the country to the other. One can only wonder, why a person would support a Conspiracy Theory that is universally discredited by the scientific community, and put at obvious risk his entire credibility as a Morrisseau authenticator of any level.

Norval called the Principal Conspiracy Theorist, “The Shark in Still Waters.” Principal Morrisseau Dealer AKA Principal Conspiracy Theorist. No matter which disguise he uses, no one in Canadian art history has ever before, so aggressively sought out the media spotlight for himself, by setting out to deliberately place himself, and his Conspiracy Theory about supposed Morrisseau forgeries, at the centre of a public discussion from one end of the country to the other. One can only wonder, why a person would support a Conspiracy Theory that is universally discredited by the scientific community, and put at obvious risk his entire credibility as a Morrisseau authenticator of any level.

1 – CHILL & KILL the Voice – The trio – all decades long business associates – obviously acting in concert, less than five hours apart, made spurious charges to our server, about “privacy violations,” to try the get our service cut off and our site closed down.

A fabulous Norval "Diary" painting telling exactly of what he thought of the Principal Conspiracy Theorist. He called him a "Shark in Still Waters" complete with shark fin headress.... And yes, of course, the signature and title have already been forensically authenticated by a top Canadian scientist.

A fabulous Norval “Diary” painting telling exactly of what he thought of the Principal Conspiracy Theorist. He called him a “Shark in Still Waters” complete with shark fin headress…. And yes, of course, the signature and title have already been forensically authenticated by a top Canadian scientist.

“The Terms of Service have a clause titled: 10.05 Private Information and Images. Subscribers may not post or disclose any personal or private information about or images of children or any third party without the consent of said party (or a parent’s consent in the case of a minor).”

The Demands of the Art Terrorists

Claiming “privacy rights” these three leading Conspiracy Theorists demanded that their names be removed from all our public postings about their public business activities.

After 13 long years of associating themselves, and their names, prominently in the media with supposed Morrisseau fakes and forgeries, why would they now try to impose a CHILL & KILL attack on our public interest media site?

Junior Conspiracy Theorist is working hard trying to earn his father's mantle as Principal Conspiracy Theorist.

Junior Conspiracy Theorist is working hard trying to earn his father’s mantle as Principal Conspiracy Theorist.

While investigating compliance with the Terms of Service of our server, we put our site “under construction” while we revamped the site to accommodate the privacy regulations as defined for us by the legal department of our server.

(These vary from server to server. Some, when challenged, run easily away from protecting free speech rights; others, like Google, are staunch defenders of Free Speech.)

While conferring with our server’s legal department we explained that the complainants seeking to shut down our site, were people who are all very public actors, and have over 13 years, purposely made themselves public personalities, by going to the media, or using their corporate blog, to spread propaganda to promote their cause of a Conspiracy Theory that helps bring a huge financial benefit to their business, their art collections and their relatives.

The Principal Conspiracy Theorist Lawyer AaronX Milrad...Aaron Milrad has repeatedly sought out the media spotlight, to make himself the centre of a public debate, by deliberately stoking the fires of controversy with his wild Conspiracy Theory of thousands of forgeries by a syndicate of diabolical forgers. This was one of his bravura performances.

The Principal Conspiracy Theorist Lawyer has repeatedly sought out the media spotlight, to make himself the centre of a public debate, by deliberately stoking the fires of controversy with his wild Conspiracy Theory of thousands of forgeries by a syndicate of diabolical forgers.

All the while devaluing the art collections of others by millions of dollars.

We pointed out that our blog contained no private or personal information, nor do we even know, or have any interest in, anything private or personal about any of the complainants.

The legal department sent us their official definition of “private or personal” as it applies to their company’s Terms of Service.

“We define personal Identifying Information as providing a person’s First and Last name in conjunction with each other, a phone number, email address, physical address, Social Security Number, images of a person.”

Therefore we modified our site to be in compliance with the Terms of Service and its official definition.

The Conspiracy Theorists then shifted into Phase II of their cyber attack.

2 – CHILL & KILL BY MOUNTING KRG ADVERTISING ON OUR LINK – Having quickly gotten the server to shut us down, before we had a chance to respond, Kinsman Robinson Galleries then decided to petulantly “give us the finger,” and in a particularly mean-spirited assault, quickly bought a “sponsored link” for corporate advertising for their gallery on our temporarily disabled site.

While our site was down, to bring it into compliance, anyone from around the world who clicked our MorrisseauHoaxExposedBlog.com would see, instead, a prominent Kinsman Robinson Galleries advertisement re-directing visitors who came to our site – which was now temporarily disabled – instead to the Kinsman Robinson Galleries, the very people who had attacked our blog, and were in high gear to CHILL & KILL our public interest educational site.

host_ad_blogWhen we reported our outrage at this diabolical KRG initiative, to the server, the customer relations people expressed that they too were utterly aghast at what their advertising department had, unknowingly, been a party to.

In a word: diabolical. Two words: unconscionable, and devious…

The server quickly dismounted the Kinsman Robinson Galleries advertising attack ad on our blog link.

Actually, rather than clarifying anything, clicking the link for a KRG explanation of the Hoax, could lead anyone into a whole lot of trouble. Here’s why:

A ludicrous document to any historian.

A screen grab from the KRG blog, of a ludicrous document to any historian.

Left is the link you would end up with, on the KRG blog page, sporting – you won’t believe this! – a totally unreliable document posing as some kind of proof of anything! It demonstrates exactly what I’ve been saying, that there is no one at KRG who has academic credentials as a historian, as a document examiner, as a handwriting analysis expert, or as an investigative journalist. Or they would never post such a ludicrous document with its accompanying text.

And which is also why they don’t seem to mind at all ordering people to change or falsify documents and photos.

Even using basic common sense tells you this document could be doctored and manipulated in many different ways.

Even an amateur eye can tell that Norval Morrisseau – allowing he wrote that wobbly signature – DID NOT write the declaration at the top. Someone kindly did it for him – or should we say, for themselves…? And the bottom too. There is no proof of any kind that any of the writing was done simultaneously. It could have been done, literally years apart…

The typical BDP signature on the back of almost all of Randy Potter’s Morrisseaus, that the Principal Morrisseau Dealer and other Morrisseau collectors saw. The Conspiracy Theorists, at first in love with the signatures, would suddenly change their minds, say the huge signatures on every canvas were all forged, never explaining why such a huge betraying forgery would possibly be put there by even the dumbest forger, knowing it would betray him instantly. In fact the Stupid Forger was turned in by the signature DNA in the end thanks to handwriting analysis by top Canadian forensic scientists. The Dumb Forger turned out to be, with DNA certainty, none other than Norval Morrisseau himself.

Unlike the writings on the back of hundreds of Morrisseau BDPs, which have been scientifically proven to have been signed, titled, and dated by the same hand, and that hand was Norval Morrisseau’s, with DNA certainty, and that no one else was involved with any of it. (See Glossary: BDP)

We also know Bob Bateman sat down with a pile of his calendar art reproduction “prints” and signed hundreds at a time, one after the other. He didn’t know where his signed repros were going; he didn’t care. He just mindlessly signed away till he got a cramp, just because his distributor told him he wanted 500 signatures… Bateman’s Cramped Hand

How many dozens, or scores, of these blank Delta hotel chits did someone plop in front of Norval and have him scrawl his signature, so they could later have the tops and bottoms added to suit the occasion, or the case they were trying to make…?

To me, as a professional historian, the document DOES NOT prove “Norval Morrisseau Declarations Are No Hoax,” but is an interesting historical curiosity, at best… And raises all kinds of questions, rather than, as KRG would have you believe, offering proof of anything.

But we are flattered: it is the first time that KRG appropriates the word “Hoax” from our blog to try to address the serious Hoax problem for Canadian and international audiences.

If this is the quality of document they offer as an explanation then their case is in far worse trouble than they know…

For starters: from whom did the original paper document come from and when? Which hotel did it come from and when? Who wrote the first line and when? Who wrote the signature and when? Who wrote the bottom line and when? How many more of these are spurious autograph chits are out there?

In the accompanying text there are, in fact, many more dishonest allusions made by the writer, trying to bundle forgeries, with moral rights, and copyright violations, in another attempt to try to backdate the “forgery” allegations to 1993, when in fact there was absolutely no… none… zip… nada… talk of forgeries by anyone, anywhere. And there would be none for years afterwards…

Their Shame; Their Shame; Their Utter Shame – We very well understand why the trio of Principal Conspiracy Theorists would not want to have their names published alongside the documentary disclosures we have made, involving their published comments as noted on hundreds of pages of court transcripts, hundreds of paintings, hundreds of documents and affidavits, and hundreds of emails, letters, and media interviews.

Frankly, I wouldn’t want my name associated or published, either, alongside the hugely compromising and incriminating evidence that is directly and indirectly connected to their names on sworn Affidavits, historical records, court documents, official court transcripts, media articles, radio and television interviews, and findings in scientific reports.

I would be ashamed too. And want to hide from any and all publicity associated with past misdeeds as noted, in the media, on blogs, and in public documents and court transcripts, over many years by outraged leading Canadians in the fine art community.

Also, being incontrovertibly tied to multiple acts of cultural genocide against Canadian First Nations art and artists cannot be a happy legacy for anyone to be remembered for by posterity.

Hiding as much of the infamy, by engaging in CHILL & KILL against investigative journalists, would seem to be one way they have chosen to go.

It was what Lance Armstrong tried to do, also, for a while, with the same kind of CHILL and KILL tactics in the media, and with SLAPP suits in the courts against decent other athletes who tried to come clean with their past misdeeds.

Trying to destroy a lot of innocent people along the way is just part of the collateral damage that ruthless business operatives like Armstrong, Conrad Black, and the Conspiracy Theorists are willing to pile up while raking in the millions.

Consider these Truths:

The McClintock SET UP – Richard McClintock, a Canadian art forger was arrested in 2010, after trying to sell only two (2) high-end forgeries by famous Quebec artists. The forgeries were instantly caught by an art dealer; the forger was instantly caught by police; the forger was instantly sentenced by the court.

THE KRG CLAIM – In 2001, Kinsman Robinson Galleries of Toronto, announced that there were “thousands of forgeries by umpteen forgers” out there.

CHILL and KILL Shame #1: In 13 years neither KRG nor the Principal Conspiracy Theorist Lawyer or any other Conspiracy Theorist has ever been able to take a single “forger” or “forgery” to court. Not even once.

Though they claimed to have thousands – over four thousand said Donald Robinson – to pick from…

They very well knew that any judge would have seen through their charges of forgery as merely a cheap, and shabby – and quite diabolical – business initiative, to attack their business competitors, purely for personal financial gain.

And to control the market by convincing people that most of the paintings, sold by their competitors were fakes, and that the only way to be sure of getting authentic original Morrisseaus, was to buy them from Kinsman Robinson Galleries of Toronto.

CHILL and KILL Shame #2: After an RCMP investigation over two years that cost millions, not a single charge was laid against anyone, nor a forgery identified, or a forger found. The RCMP closed down the investigation.

So much for the substance of what the Robinsons and Milrad were claiming.

It gets worse; they really did start going to court, at last…

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger #3: The very first person the Principal Conspiracy Theorist took to court, in 2010, was – can you believe this? – in a despicable SLAPP suit, against a highly informed and extremely well researched blogger, Ugo Matulic, to try to shut him up from exposing their diabolical and unprincipled business activities.

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger #4: When our blog went up we received an instant Cease and Desist notification demanding that we shut down our blog.

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger #5: Principal Morrisseau Conspiracy Theorist cyber attack on our server.

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger #6: Junior Morrisseau Conspiracy Theorist cyber attack on our server.

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger #7: Principal Morrisseau Conspiracy Theorist Lawyer cyber attack on our server.

CHILL and KILL: Shoot the Messenger SUMMARY: For 13 long years, neither the Principal Morrisseau Dealer, nor the Principal Morrisseau Lawyer, took a single forger, or forgery, or retailer of supposed forgeries, to court. Not once.

Everyone knows why; the whole thing was a Hoax from the beginning that could never hope to pass the smell test, certainly not in court.

The Conspiracy Theorists knew what would work better than the courts – private threats and “enforcement.”

Plus spreading propaganda through negligent, gullible, and compliant journalists and media outlets.

The Conspiracy Theorists already had launched behind the scenes private attacks on their art dealer competitors:
– with their “enforcers” making visits to dealers and enforcing compliance,
– engaging in private surveillance by “Mr. Smith,”
– attacking art shows and demanding paintings be removed,
– threatening phone calls,
– malicious and defamatory website and blog postings against collectors and paintings,
– forcing the cancellation of book launches,
– enforcing the delisting of auction paintings,
– launching physical attacks in the street and at the place of residence of a dealer who refused to comply with the Diktats of the Conspiracy Theorists.

Now, when highly informed and well researched independent journalists investigate just what the hell is going on in Canada’s fine art Morrisseau market, the Conspiracy Theorists, now begin to viciously target these journalists, by ramping up their cyber stalking, and art terrorism to shut them up by trying to close down their servers, and launching SLAPP suits in court.

What does this say about the claim that started all this, supposedly of “thousands of forgeries and umpteen forgers?”

Jack Pollock, Norval’s most successful and longest art dealer wouldn’t have been surprised. Of long experience he wrote all about, “… what the art world is like: scheming, manipulative, and, quite often, downright fraudulent.” – Jack Pollock, Norval Morrisseau’s longest (1962-1981) & most successful (12 shows) dealer

There is a further problem related to people who engage in Art Terrorism like this.

CHILL & KILL: DISTORT DOCUMENTS Shame #7

Principal Conspiracy Theorist, and his KRG Associate Director, in warm embrace with kingpin enforcer of the Conspiracy Theorists, Mark Anthony Jacobson. It is not known if this photo was made before he made the threatening phone call to Jessica Wilson, or after... Jacobson a very recent convert to the group ran the vilest website we've ever encountered on the Canadian internet, featuring ALL the worst words in the dictionary, and many which are not, targeted at people like Ugo Matulic, who spent thousands of dollars to have key paintings evaluated by Canada's top forensic scientists. Observers in the Canadian fine art community, just shake their heads, and wonder, how can a man like Robinson, who has long headed one of the leading art galleries in Canada, consort happily with the two most discredited website bloggers - Jacobson and Sinclair - in Canadian history? He has frequently hosted their posts on his KRG blog site and multiple times inside his gallery, where many say they get their orders, if not their pay cheques. PS - We stand corrected, Jacobson's website is the second vilest in Canadian history, edged out - just slightly - by that run by the Montreal dismemberment murderer. And just beating out that operated by Ritchie Sinclair.

The Principal Conspiracy Theorist demands we doctor (falsify) pictures and other documents, to hide his face and not disclose his identity…

The trio is demanding that we alter historical documents to hide their names and obliterate their connection to past events as noted on many legal and sworn documents.

This means they want us to join in an immoral and unethical cover-up of their past behaviour in past events as noted in published and unpublished historical documents.

And they want us to obliterate their faces on photos that are already posted by themselves and others on other internet sites and in Google caches.

cheque_davidson600supxxxAs a professional historian, I am totally aghast at anyone altering any historical documents, and photos, or at people demanding others do it for them, just to try to hide their participation in historic and public events.

There is no telling, where a diabolical practice like that, once begun, can lead…

It is unconscionable to me that a trio of self-serving businessmen – including a lawyer no less – is completely at ease with demanding that we alter documents to suit their private agendas.

I fully understand that they want to hide from being incriminated in countless affidavits and allegations made by many people under oath.

This is tantamount to falsifying documents. Removing text, or removing a face, falsifies the original integrity of a document or picture. Whether done rightly or wrongly, the altered document is no longer a reflection of the original truth it once represented.

A historical document is therefore transformed into a propaganda document and now no longer reflects an original truth, but a new altered reality.

At a minimum it is a furtive attempt to hide something… Usually something unseemly.

A new reality that the document and picture manipulators are more happy to promote, as their version of the truth…

Government officials and politicians do this all the time, to hide crooked, behind the scenes dealings with party bagmen, and corporate con men, to whom they are financially beholden.

The Implication

It is why politicians – and lawyers, who direct them in this unethical direction – fight each other for the bottom spot of every trust or respect index ever published in every single public opinion poll ever taken.

Being at ease with trying to enforce the falsifying of documents has grave implications also, in the case of art sold by the Conspiracy Theorist businessmen, where it raises equally disturbing questions, not only about the morality and ethics of the people selling the art, but of the very integrity of their art itself.

With this cyber attack they are compelling people to alter documents, alter names, and change photos, and are sending clear signals that they are completely all right with doing that. And anything similar if that’s what it takes to achieve their bottom line.

Which raises numerous disturbing questions. How can anyone in future:

– possibly trust that when they say paintings in their gallery are indeed by Norval Morrisseau, that they are not by some other contract painter: say Karl Burrows, or Gabe Vadas, Bryant Ross, or… who knows?

– possibly trust any appraisal that their gallery issues?

– possibly trust any Certificate of Authenticity their gallery issues?

– possibly trust any call their gallery makes certifying a painting as authentic?

– possibly trust any call their gallery makes certifying a painting as a “forgery?”

– possibly trust their credibility on any level as a trustworthy Morrisseau authenticator?

– possibly believe their gallery label has any value, other than noting the name of a gallery whose principals are perfectly willing to falsify documents, pictures, and records when it suits their purpose, or order others to do it?

It’s easy to see with businessmen demonstrating that they are completely comfortable with cyber terrorism, and using this kind of unethical behavior in pursuit of a CHILL and KILL agenda, that they have irreparably damaged the public’s belief that they are an honest broker in the Canadian fine art market.

That they have totally debased the coinage of their KRG brand.

It can only upset outside observers so much they may very well consider launching a class action suit to recover damage done to the value of their paintings.

It can also upset former clients of the gallery to form their own class action suit as they no longer trust that the paintings they bought on good faith, from Morrisseau’s “Wheelchair Invalid Painting Period,” are indeed genuine…

If the principals of the company are so passionate in CHILL & KILL initiatives against journalists, just what the hell are they hiding?

Terrorizing Norval that “Dumb” Indian

You better read this to find out all the ways that white men have used, and abused Indians for personal gain and profit...
You better read this to find out all the ways that white men have used, and abused Indians for personal gain and profit…

If they are quite at ease with forcing people to falsify documents and photos, how much did they force the “wheelchair invalid” to sign those “Affidavits of Forgery” for them?

For some twelve years, Norval was a total wheelchair invalid and dreaded hugely being abandoned and just thrown onto the street.

Norval knew he was penniless – as he told John Geddes, of Macleans Magazine, in 2003 – and was as helpless, and vulnerable as any virtual quadriplegic is, to outside pressures to comply with the Diktats of his so-called “care-givers.” He told Geddes he wished he had a few dollars so he could buy some paint and canvas…

Morrisseau apparently died with no assets, no bank account, no house, no paintings. Obviously he must have been a man ripe for manipulation, just to survive…

In 2006 Noravl became a vicim of the white men around his wheelchair and ended up having to pay $11,000 to Joe Otavnik for not recognizing a painting he had done, and mistakenly calling it a fake.

In 2006 Noraval became a victim of the white men around his wheelchair and ended up having to pay $11,000 to Joe Otavnik for not recognizing a painting he had done, and mistakenly calling it a fake.

One certainly wonders what kind of “protection” and “care” Norval Morrisseau got from the three white people who were supposed to protect his personal and business interests – Gabe Vadas who held Norval’s Power of Attorney, Aaron Milrad, Norval’s longtime lawyer, and Donald Robinson, the Principal Morrisseau Dealer, who was in charge of all sales of Norval’s paintings?

When Norval died penniless…

Or so he was led to believe…

DID YOU KNOW? – NORVAL OBVIOUSLY DID NOT! – that at the time Norval was complaining about living on the edge of poverty to Geddes, that his white business partners – Vadas and Robinson – had a secret stash of 384 of his paintings, worth some $20,000,000 to $40,000,000 (twenty to forty million dollars) hidden away – from Norval, from his family and their lawyers – in the basement of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries?

Waiting for Norval to die...

Waiting for Norval to die…

And they would be there, for seven years, waiting for the “Inconvenient Indian” to die, until long after his death, according to terms of a secret deal between Vadas and Robinson.

How much of this secret movement of Norval’s millions was his lawyer, Milrad, aware of, and a party to? Whose fiduciary duty was he watching out for, during all this furtive movement of the Indian’s wealth from one white businessman to another?

While Norval died without a nickel to his name and nothing… zip… nada… to leave to his children…

This shocker slipped out inadvertently when a distracted Robinson was giving passionate court testimony on an unrelated matter. (Coming Soon: in the Hatfield v Child Case.)

To what degree, was Norval, fearing dire poverty and possible abandonment, forced to sign affidavits of forgery, against his better judgment, on paintings he very well knew were genuine works he had painted?

What is incontrovertible is that Norval was suffering from Parkinson’s since the early 1990s. A common accompanying condition, in from 30% to 68% of all Parkinson’s patients, is Dementia.

Ritchie Sinclair has proof Norval had left the building in 1997...

Ritchie Sinclair has proof Norval had left the building in 1997…

Ritchie Says – There is, in fact, lots of testimonial evidence that Norval was a victim of gross mental lapses going back to the mid-90s. According to Ritchie Sinclair, Norval published at least five forgeries in his book “Travels to the House of Invention” in 1997. It seems Norval just didn’t have good recall of what he’d done even then.

And the book’s editor you may ask? Well this was three years before the Principal Morrisseau Dealer would bid ninety (90) different times, all on paintings he later said were all fakes, so he obviously couldn’t tell a fake from a real painting either.

Wolf Says – And certainly Norval told Wolf, his brother and one-time business manager, in 2001, that he couldn’t remember which of his past works he had painted. At that time, Wolf testified, Norval was only lucid for a few minutes at a time, before he drifted off…

Everybody Says – All clear signs of Dementia. And hardly surprising, because by 2000, Norval Morrisseau had the most wasted body (and mind) of any leading Canadian personality. Bar none…

Photo-Ops – He was little more than meat on a wheelbarrow that his “care givers” trundled from photo-op to photo-op to help promote sales of his paintings.

82 year old Joe McLoed called it "elder abuse," the wringer that the Conspiracy Theorists were putting Norval through. Few disagreed...

82 year old Joe McLoed called it “elder abuse,” the wringer that the Conspiracy Theorists were putting Norval through. Few disagreed…

Elder Abuse – This is elder abuse of the highest order. What defences could Norval possibly have put up to prevent the exploitation of his name, his signature, his reputation, his very body…?

Helpless – His utter mental and physical incapacity and helplessness, is why, in this entire ten-year period, there are no television or radio interviews of any kind, with Norval, anywhere. And that includes in the entire CBC one-hour show “Life and Times of Norval Morrisseau,” shot in 2004, when the producer couldn’t get him to utter even one word for the program.

His white business managers did all the talking for him…

Because Norval had clearly “left the building,” a long, long time before…

(We’ll set aside Donald Robinson’s self-promotional bluster to the National Post’s Murray Whyte in 2001, that it was “preposterous” for the journalist to even suggest that Norval might not remember every one of his 10,000 paintings he had painted over a 50 year career.)

fake_smallThis would certainly go a long way to explain the countless mistakes, and contradictions, and utterly false calls that are legion in the Affidavits of Forgery – all sent to Kinsman Robinson Galleries’ major business competitors – on which Norval’s signature appears, and which I consider the most unreliable documents I’ve ever encountered in 46 years as a practicing professional historian.

Ask yourself. Would Conspiracy Theorists really be comfortable with making Norval do something so unethical, just to make money?

You know, get Norval to sign documents, they all knew, or should have known, were completely inaccurate, and in fact, often false…

Which brings us back to the current threats from the same people, forcing us to falsify documents to accommodate their bottom line…

What goes around, seems to come around…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Probing Perjury 7

sign_honest_truth_orRitchie Sinclair claims:

– two Goldi claims were “struck” down by a judge in court, for allegedly failing to show cause…

“A. Mr. and Mrs. Goldie recently sued me in Small Claims Court, Newmarket, though they now live in Toronto.
THE COURT: Sorry, what’s the last name?
A. Mr. and Mrs. Goldie, they sold me – sued me, representing their company, Goldie Productions Limited, and they sued me personally themselves. Their two claims were struck because disclosing no cause of action, and….” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 24, 2012)

  • Ritchie Sinclair is a longtime acolyte and business associate of Donald Robinson of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries, where he has been a private dinner guest, made video presentations, done guided tours, been praised in KRG blogs, thanked as an authority in Donald Robinson’s “expert” reports, etc. They have been “tag team” partners, and the only witnesses on the losing side, in several court cases (Otavnik v Sinclair 2010, Hatfield v Child 2012) where they have sought, unsuccessfully, to convincingly represent the Conspiracy Theorist position. (The partners have already agreed to join up for more joint court performances in 2013).

The Collaborators Outside the Court – Probably the most damaging photo ever published about a judicial proceeding in Canadian history; I predict it will be used in legal text books, by generations to come. Sinclair and Robinson right, outside the courtroom where the tag-team performed for Conspiracy Theorist Proxy #4, Margaret Hatfield . The association has cost her some $40,000 wasted on a case she could never win.

My Take: Perjury, Delusion, or Dementia?

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Just how many false statements is it possible to make under oath, in a couple of sentences?

We are suing Ritchie Sinclair for malicious defamation of our Morrisseau paintings.

He falsely claims the action was launched in Newmarket, when it was initiated in Brampton, which is nowhere near Newmarket, nor even in the same jurisdiction.

He falsely claims we live in Toronto, which we have not, for over 50 years, but have resided for decades in Mississauga.

He falsely claims “two claims were struck,” creating two falsehoods: that the claims were “struck,” or ordered removed which is a total falsehood, and that a judge knocked down our claims, which is another complete falsehood.

He falsely claims “because disclosing no cause of action” trying to intimate there was no merit to our case.

In spite of the fact that Soma has been authenticated by Donald Robinson, Norval Morrisseau, and Kenneth J Davies, as an authentic Morrisseau, Sinclair knows best, and has posted it as a forgery on his website. So much for his concern about forgeries. Clearly malice is his intent.

In spite of the fact that Soma has been authenticated by Donald Robinson, Norval Morrisseau, and Kenneth J Davies, as an authentic Morrisseau, Sinclair apparently “knows best,” and has kept on posting it as a forgery on his website. So much for his professed concern about forgeries, when he overrules the “Top Three” in the field.  Clearly malice is his only intent.

We sued him in August 2011, for maliciously defamation and for devaluing our paintings on his website.

We had protested to him, in February 2012, when he willfully published private information about our mutual Settlement Conference, in total violation of Ontario Court Rules, as he very well knew. Not only that, but he falsified the information that he chose to publish.

Seeking to score points on behalf of the Conspiracy Theorists he published that our two claims “were struck down by the Judge” and “showing no cause of action” which was a total and absolute lie.

We warned him that he was breaching the privacy of our Settlement Conference, and reminded him that he was also breaking Ontario Court rules, as well as making false statements. When we asked him to remove these illegal and false statements from his malicious and defamatory website, he refused, in fact choosing to accelerate the defamation by publishing more stuff.

We protested to the court, in a Motion heard before Deputy Judge KF McCrae, on Dec. 5, 2012 in Brampton, ON.

Though certified by the "Holy Trinity" of Morrisseau authenticators - Robinson, Morrisseau, and Davies - Sinclair maliciously posts this on his defamatory website.

Though certified by the “Holy Trinity” of Morrisseau authenticators – Robinson, Morrisseau, and Davies – Sinclair maliciously posts this on his defamatory website.

Justice McCrae sternly upbraided Sinclair, saying what he did was a clear violation of court rules.

He also told him that the information he published was also incorrect. He told him sternly, that “What you said was not true,” and told him, firmly, to remove his misinformation from his website, instantly.

Sinclair argued back, that what he published was true, saying he wanted some time to respond to the Judge’s order.

Justice McCrae grew visibly angry, leaning forward and sternly glared at Sinclair, “I repeat what you said was not true. And I want it gone now!”

The Judge’s manner alarmed even Sinclair, who muttered he would comply.

Justice McCrae awarded us court costs of $150, against Sinclair. Other judges pointedly denied Sinclair’s request for court costs, telling him that they rightfully belonged to us, if we had asked – we didn’t –  or awarded them to us without us asking. We weren’t intersted in penalizing anyone or winning cheap shots. We were interested only in courts ruling fairly on material points.

It would be one of 8 rulings out of 8, in which four different judges in public hearings in our case, found in our favour and against Sinclair – Holub (1), McCrae (1), Bobesich (1), and Filkin (5).

Summary of the Motions in Goldi (Plaintiff) v Sinclair (Defendant) – Filed Aug 16, 2011

Plaintiff’s Motion 1 – GRANTED by Justice Holub – Nov 16, 2012 – The Goldi Productions Ltd. Motion, requesting to postpone the trial, was granted by Judge Holub, because (1) we had not been provided with any printed documents at all by the Defendant, though we had provided all our 11 books of documents in support of the Plaintiff’s Claim, on May 1, seven months before.

The stay was also granted (2) because of the delay in publication of Judge Paul Martial’s finding from the Hatfield v Child case. We had requested the adjournment in our case so we could benefit from and acquire (a) the Hatfield v Child court transcripts and (b) Judge Paul Martial’s finding in that case.

Plaintiff’s Motion 2 – GRANTED by Justice McCrae – Dec 5, 2012 – The Goldi Productions Ltd. Motion requesting to have the Defendant Sinclair remove (1) illegal – a gross violation of Court Rules – (2) deliberately distorted, and (3) fallacious information about the Feb 8, 2012 Settlement Conference from his web site was granted

Justice McCrae declared the published information was a (1) violation of Court Rules, furthermore that (2) “what you (Defendant Sinclair) said and published was not true,” and that he (3) he wanted it all removed “immediately.”

At Justice McCrae’s discretion – we did not ask – we were awarded Court Costs of $150.

Plaintiff’s Motion 3 – GRANTED by Justice Bobesich – Jan 24, 2013 – The Goldi Productions Ltd. Motion requesting to adjourn the hearing of the Defendant’s five part Motion was granted because the Defendant Sinclair had not given us the requisite amount of time to prepare a defence.

On Nov 16, Judge Holub ordered Sinclair to file his change of venue Motion by Dec 31, 2012. Sinclair filed it on Dec 28, the year’s last business day, and was given a court date of Jan 24, for a hearing.

Clearly intending to use ambush tactics, the Defendant Sinclair waited almost another three weeks before mailing us notification of our court appearance, so that we would not have adequate time to prepare and file a defence.

The Defendant’s late and delayed posting was a clear and intended violation of court rules, as it did not meet the minimum mailing time necessary for adequate service, leaving us only five days to prepare. We asked for adequate time to respond and the Court agreed, granting us (1) an adjournment and (2) a full month to prepare.

Sinclair’s request asking for us to be docked court costs was denied by Justice Bobesich, saying that court costs were ours, not Sinclair’s, by right, as we were the winning litigant. However, we did not ask for Sinclair to be docked costs.

Defendant’s Motions 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 – DENIED by Justice Filkin – Feb 26, 2013 – All five Motions requested by the Defendant Ritchie Sinclair were quashed.

DENIED – request to change the venue to the Toronto Small Claims Court

DENIED – request to stay or dismiss the action

DENIED – request a declaration that the Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant

DENIED – request to seal prohibited information and strike out inflammatory statements

DENIED – request an undertaking for the plaintiff to provide further particulars

Without our asking Justice Filkin chose to award us Court Costs of $100.

So far from any judge or court, striking down any of our motions, they have – unanimously – found in our favour in every case.

Posted in BDPs - Black Drybrush Signed Painting, Court Cases, Forensic Expert Findings, Perjury or Dementia

Probing Perjury 6

sign_honest_truth_orDonald Robinson claims:

– that all the Morrisseaus sold at Randy Potters – some 2,000, out of which he bought 31 himself – were cheap and lousy fakes that even an amateur could pick out  

sign_honest_face_robinson“Q. Schiller: Okay; well, let’s break it down. You believe that the Potter source paintings are all fakes; correct?
A. Robinson:  Yes I do.” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 23, 2012 p 2)

“Q. Schiller: And do you believe that the actions of Artworld of Sherway along with Jim White, who was the consignor of the painting, amount to some form of fraudulent scheme?
A. Robinson: I certainly do.

Q. And you believe that Donna Child is involved in that fraudulent scheme?
A. Yes.” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 23, 2012 p 4)

Background: With that claim, expressed as an absolute totality, without a single reservation, telling Judge Martial in the Hatfield v Child case, that it involved the greatest fraud in Canadian art history, Donald Robinson first went public, on May 18, 2001, in the National Post. He then claimed that the world was suddenly inundated with hundreds (later thousands) of Morrisseau forgeries, created by a single (later umpteen) forgers, and they were all being auctioned by Randy Potter and then resold by Robinson’s major business competitors, like Jim White and Artworld of Sherway.

My Take: Perjury, Delusion or Dementia?

I don’t believe for a second, that there is, in this world or the next, a single person who believes Donald Robinson – whether he claims this, in front of a judge, or anywhere else – and that includes himself…

Here’s why:

My favourite memory of the Straight Arrow in a typical pose.

My favourite memory of the Straight Arrow in a typical pose.

Refunds for Fake Morrisseaus – Out of some 2,000 sales, over 10 years, not a single Morrisseau painting was ever returned to Randy Potter for a refund.

Not a single customer ever asked for his money back, or complained they were sold a fake. A truly awesome encomium for honesty for a retail business, of an astonishing 100%.

Now go ahead and name me the Toronto businessman who can claim that?

And even Robinson, who bought 31 Morrisseaus for $53,228.73 never brought a single one back, never asked for a refund, nor complained to Randy he was sold a fake.

  • “Mr. Donald Robinson has never returned or attempted to return any of the Norval Morrisseau paintings he purchased from my auction and later implied were fake in the May 18, 2001, National Post article.” (Affidavit, Randy Potter, Mar 11, 2005)

cheque_robinson_misssuper

And another thing: Robinson, whose chutzpah is nothing if not legendary, did bring back one painting he claimed was a fake, demanding a refund for $267.50. But – you won’t believe this – not for a Morrisseau, but for a Robert Davidson…

Without saying a word – I’m absolutely certain – Randy, with no questions asked, paid Robinson the entire amount he demanded, down to the last 50 cents.

And, in the process, going far, far beyond the bounds of what any other retailer, let alone any auctioneer, on the planet, would ever do to satisfy a disgruntled customer.

Because Robinson, in another display of his legendary chutzpah, came back to demand a refund on the Davidson, a full 14 months after buying the painting.

No auction anywhere in Canada would ever have given him a refund, even had he brought it back a day after buying it. And no Canadian fine art auction will give refunds beyond a month after purchase and then only if you have incontrovertible proof from an accepted independent authority that your painting is a fake.

They would have all, unanimously, laughed Robinson out of the building.

Robinson very well knew all that. It was all standard in the professional world he lived in.

But he knew something else too, of which he was equally sure.

That Randy Potter was a decent guy, far above the norm in the auction – let alone the fine art business.

That Robinson could demand something so absolutely inappropriate for a long-ago completed sales transaction because he knew Randy would come through, with the $267.50, no matter how outrageous was Robinson’s demand.

But Robinson knew something else: he had to move fast – in a manner of speaking – if he ever expected to get his 200 bucks back.

He very well knew, the day he went to get his refund, that he had already slammed Randy in private to a journalist who would publish the next month, in the national media, his accusation that Randy was a lowlife scammer. He probably knew after his accusations came out, in the National Post, even Randy’s good will might have been stretched past the point of no return, and he might not give him back his two hundred bucks.

cheque_davidson600sup

This is all stunning proof that actions speak louder than words, all around.

About the honesty of some people.

Which brings us back to the alleged Morrisseau fakes… With all the evidence in, where, on the planet, is there a single person left, anywhere, who believes that Robinson personally, truly believed the 31 Morrisseau paintings he bought at Potters really were fakes?

Would a guy who played hardball over $200 just throw away $54,000 on fake paintings?

The Inexplicalble: Why did Robinson or the Conspiracy Theorists ever take the Wanker 31 to court?

The inexplicable: Why did Robinson or the Conspiracy Theorists never take the Wanker 31 to court?

In the end, for all their malicious defamation in the national media and the courts, neither Donald Robinson nor his Conspiracy Theorists ever took Randy Potter to court.

Or anyone else for allegedly selling the thousands of fakes they got at Randy Potters.

Even though they had 13 years and counting to do it, and supposedly thousands of “forgeries” to pick from, and even though they slammed numerous decent Canadian business people in the art world as lowlife scammers.

Which has to be the ultimate proof for sincerity.

Why not? Obviously none of them had proof of anything, but that their claims would only get them laughed out of a police station or a court. And they very well knew it. Why?

Because all along the Conspiracy Theory was nothing more than just shabby MBA 101: control supply and demand by saying only your own paintings are guaranteed to be authentic; that thousands of paintings sold by your business competitors are fakes; and right the balance in your favour by ruining the reputation of your business competitors.

The Absent-minded Donald Robinson:

There are two more extremely important facts that Donald Robinson wants the world to forget about Randy Potter paintings:

morrisseau_fish_authFirst, that the “Holy Trinity” authenticated paintings “FISH & SOMA 1976” came from Randy Potter.

I own, “FISH & SOMA 1976,” the only Morrisseaus in the world which are “Holy Trinity” authenticated, by Donald Robinson himself – he was the under bidder and authenticated them verbally to my face; Norval Morrisseau, the artist; and Kenneth J Davies, one of Canada’s top handwriting analysis experts who certified them both as signed with DNA certainty, by Norval Morrisseau, and by no one else.

morrisseau_soma190fa2These two paintings “FISH & SOMA 1976” offer a truly stunning view behind the curtain of secrecy which Donald Robinson and the Norval Morrisseau Heritage Society have sought to cover up “the biggest fraud in Canadian art history.” (More to come.)

morrisseau_heffelsduo190faSecondly, Robinson also chose to overlook the fact that two of the Potter paintings he defamed as forgeries, “Spirits 2b” and “Father and Son 1977,” were proven to be authentic by forensic scientists, and became the winning proof in the two largest successful lawsuits alleging defamation, won in 2008 by Joe Otavnik v Vadas and Morrisseau (for $11,000) and Michael Moniz v CTVglobemedia (for some $25,000.)

Why have these been completely hidden from public view by Donald Robinson and the Norval Morrisseau Heritage Society?

Why have these been completely hidden from public view by Donald Robinson and the Norval Morrisseau Heritage Society?

Neither Defendants (including Morrisseau and Vadas, his business manager & the Globe and Mail) in those two landmark cases, believed, for a second, the Robinson claim that the Potter paintings were fakes. They paid up – big time – because they both agreed they had defamed genuine Morrisseau paintings.

It gets worse. Neither defendant – and that includes Donald Robinson’s own artist Norval Morrisseau and his business manager Gabe Vadas – even dared to go to court to face a judge with their supposed proof of forgery.

They both figured that any deal they could make outside court would be far preferable to that imposed by an angry judge who scoffed at their proof of forgeries, and an artist expert who couldn’t even mumble a word…

morrisseau_fatherandson190faBoth Morrisseau and CTVglobemedia begged for an out-of-court settlement, which Otavnik and Moniz both agreed to, knowing that the authenticity of their paintings, which Morrisseau, Vadas, Robinson, and the Globe called fakes, had been vindicated, and were safe from further malicious and defamatory statements.

In fact, every single painting from Randy Potter that has ever been analyzed by three top Canadian independent forensic experts, has come back as certified, with DNA certainty, as authentically signed by Norval Morrisseau without a single dissenting finding of any kind.

Which has to be a stunning affirmation for the honesty of Randy Potter, for the absolute authenticity of every Morrisseau painting he ever sold.

sign_shameIt explains the inexplicable: why Donald Robinson never, ever, brought back a single one of his Morrisseau “fakes” for a refund.

And leaves us to question: exactly what is the value of his court testimony on what he calls “the greatest fraud in Canadian art history?”

Posted in Art Auctions, Art Galleries, Court Cases, Forensic Expert Findings, Perjury or Dementia

Probing Perjury 5

sign_honest_truth_orRitchie Sinclair claims:

– to be a 1979 graduate of George Brown College, Toronto, ON

“# RITCHIE SINCLAIR – SWORN
EVIDENCE IN-CHIEF BY MR. SINCLAIR:
Justice Godfrey: All right, what would you like to tell me, Mr. Sinclair?
A: I’m sorry Your Honour?
Justice Godfrey: What would you like to tell me?
A: Uh, I am a graduate of Commercial Art at George Brown College, 1979.
(Court Trans/Otavnik v Sinclair: Part 6 ovs p158

  • Ritchie Sinclair is a longtime acolyte and business associate of Donald Robinson of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries, where he has been a private dinner guest, made video presentations, done guided tours, been praised in KRG blogs, thanked as an authority in Donald Robinson’s “expert” reports, etc. They have been “tag team” partners, and the only witnesses on the losing side, in several court cases (Otavnik v Sinclair 2010, Hatfield v Child 2012) where they have sought, unsuccessfully, to convincingly represent the Conspiracy Theorist position. (They have already signed up for more joint court performances in 2013).

My Take: Perjury, Delusion or Dementia?

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator. Alas, we fear, he’s also an academic imposter/impersonator…

In his very first sentence in replying to a request for a bio from Judge Godfrey, Sinclair lies.

He claims to have graduated from George Brown College somewhere in the 1979-80 period. That means recognized by a paper of some kind, right?

Community Colleges were started in Ontario, in the 1960s, during the years I was a high school teacher in Toronto. At that time an Ontario High School grad needed five years, including Grade XIII, to graduate; Ritchie Sinclair claims to have had four years to his credit.

Community colleges were started to put students who weren’t academically inclined – the four-year stream kids, without the abilities to advance in the academic stream to go on to university and the professions – to learn some technical skills instead of just becoming “high school dropouts” which they were considered at the time.

In spite of Mr. Sinclair’s fondness, in court, of calling his teacher there a professor, the community colleges at that time were staffed with technical teachers, who had more “hands-on” trades skills, than “professorial” academic credentials, which is why they were hired.

No Community Colleges in the 60s and 70s were degree granting institutions. Even in 2013, though some now give degrees in a few subjects, the overwhelming majority of credentials they grant to students continue to be certificates and diplomas.

In court Sinclair told Judge Godfrey he was a graduate of George Brown College, trying to build on one dishonesty – that he had a college graduate pedigree of some kind – to fox the judge into believing he’s maybe even got a modern style university degree, when he doesn’t even have the most rudimentary piece of paper colleges gave out during their early years.

“I Have a Degree” On one of his other websites, in fact, Sinclair actually states “I have a degree.” Though he is – understandably – not forthcoming where and when he got it.

web_sinclair_design

Lots of degrees, we all know, are available online, with affordable and quickie M.A.s, and Ph.D.s arriving by email daily… It appears Sinclair may have sent his money…

In court testimony on different occasions Sinclair was forced to admit, through rigorous cross-examination that he actually never even completed the single one-year college preparatory course, which he attended sporadically for a few months, but leaving before he received any kind of formal graduation diploma, certificate, or degree of any kind.

The course he took, and dropped out of, was actually an introductory course, designed to help students who wanted to explore art as a career, a chance to dabble a bit , while they try to figure out what to do with their life.

The most talented and most motivated would then go on to the Ontario College of Art, or attend a University and get a degree in Fine Art.

Others, like Ritchie Sinclair, would just drop out, and hang out… And thirty years later, their art prices would reflect bad life choices early on:

People will pay more for a crappy washstand than for Ritchie Sinclair paintings.

People will pay more for a crappy washstand than for Ritchie Sinclair paintings.

During the Hatfield trial Defence Counsel Brian Schiller tried to come to grips with Sinclair’s mysterious, sketchy, and often non-existent academic record, to discover what, if anything, of substance was behind his huge malicious and defamatory attacks on so many genuine Morrisseau paintings, and other First Nations artists.

  • Q. So you didn’t complete your schooling at George Brown, instead….
    A. No…
    Q. …it….
    A. …it was, it was completed. As far as my professor was concerned I, I completed the dictates of my course; he was overjoyed for me, and the course was a year-long course; I was…
    Q. So….
    A. …already…
    Q. So, sorry….
    A. …into it…
    Q. You’re…
    A. …nine months…
    Q. You….
    A. …at that time, so I would have got my diploma anyhow but…
    Q. But you didn’t….
    A. …I got to…
    Q. You don’t have….
    A. …leave early.
    Q. You don’t have a diploma, do you, sir?
    A. Well, I left without picking it up but I was told at the, at that meeting with Morrisseau, “You’ve got your diploma.” I mean, I’m sure I could get, get whatever it was but….
    Q. So your evidence is that, even though you didn’t complete the course, because you were going off with Mr. Morrisseau that qualified you to graduate; is that what you’re saying?
    A. That’s what my professor said and that’s what, see, the, the whole purpose of the course was to be hired in the field.
    Q. And how long was the course?
    A. It was a year-long.
    Q. And you finished eight months?
    A. Nine.
    Q. Nine. And were you given some designation as a result of that course?
    A. No; nor did I ever use such a thing such a designation.
    Q. And what did that course qualify you to do?
    A. Qualified me to do typeset; set-up; advertising; letter-set; very basic things that nobody uses any more.” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 23, 2012 p 124)

So, Sinclair, just like he “dropped out” of high school, he also “dropped out” of community college without even completing a single year.

So the Community Colleges, which were established in Ontario in the 1960s, especially to help out “problem kids” like Sinclair, failed him and let him drift away to an aimless existence, and finally end up as a Conspiracy Theorist “enforcer” which, apparently pays better than his life as an artist.

He finally testified, he learned nothing useful in the few months he did attend, so it was no big loss. So his only credentials are four years in high school. We think…

Offering some explanation why this self-proclaimed “Morrisseau expert” is not mentioned in any Morrisseau literature anywhere, and why he has made so many hundreds of utterly false appraisals in incorrectly calling so many forensically authenticated Morrisseau paintings forgeries.

In fact Sinclair is unique in Canada, the only person who claims to be an “expert” who has no paper credentials of any kind, and no record of genuine achievements, or is not mentioned in any professional literature in fields he pretends to be noteworthy.

He is not only a white Indian imposter/impersonator; he is also an academic imposter/impersonator.

Posted in Art Cartel, Art Galleries, Court Cases, Perjury or Dementia

Probing Perjury 4

sign_honest_truth_orRitchie Sinclair claims:

– to be a Canadian Indian

    • “In 1997 at the McMichael Gallery, that Bear Dance ceremony that Mr. Robinson mentioned, that was my initiation for taking responsibility for the continuation of the Woodland School of Art, which is a school of art that NM created himself. In other words, the style of art that Morrisseau created didn’t exist before Morrisseau created it. Um, there are hundreds of native artists that have been spawned from, from this, and I am one of them.” (Court Trans/Otavnik v Sinclair: OvsS Mar 18, 2010 – p159)
Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a longtime acolyte and business associate of Donald Robinson of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries, where he has been a private dinner guest, made video presentations, done guided tours, been praised in KRG blogs, thanked as an authority in Donald Robinson’s “expert” reports, etc. They have been “tag team” partners, and the only witnesses on the losing side, in several court cases (Otavnik v Sinclair 2010, Hatfield v Child 2012) where they have sought, unsuccessfully, to convincingly represent the Conspiracy Theorist position. (The partners have already agreed to join up for more joint court performances in 2013).

 My Take: Perjury, Delusion, or Dementia?

Sinclair has repeatedly, directly and indirectly, tried to foist on court judges – like on Judge Godfrey above – and on the public, his pretence that he is a Canadian Indian.

It all began in September 2008, a year after Norval died. (He didn’t dare do it while the artist was alive.)

A typical  example of how a "pure white" artist like Sinclair tries to ride on Indian coattails to capitalize on the fame and talent of others.

A typical example of how a “pure white” artist like Sinclair tries to disguise his origins and ride on Indian coattails to capitalize on the fame and talent of others.

Thereafter Sinclair, disguising himself with his pseudo-Indian nick-name “Stardreamer” would never, ever again, write his own name without putting Norval’s name, and his personal association with him, immediately ahead of his own.

Left a poster where Sinclair and Mark Anthony Jacobson – a fellow “enforcer” for the Conspiracy Theorists, and the operator of the second most vile website in Canadian history – had a one night showing.

In this way this white dude from downtown Toronto hoped to ride on Norval’s coattails to financial glory, as the world came to celebrate Canada’s top Aboriginal artist.

On Aug. 26, 2008, Sinclair emailed Ugo Matulic, asking him to publicize him and his new business initiative to link his name to Norval’s.

“Attached is an ad for my new show (Hope you can attend!). I’d love it if you chose to post it. Here is some writing about my “using Norval’s name” to promote my career that you can also post if you wish.

“In my new Exhibition, “Spirit,” I am capitalizing on Morrisseau’s name and fame, however my motive for doing so is not financial…

“Norval fully supports this initiative, as do other First Nations elders. When “$” people question the integrity of “using his name” I’ll just say that I’m doing my job, just as Norval wished me to. He wants me to “use his name”! For Stardreamer the “emergence” begins on September 6, 2008, at the Scollard Street Gallery (112 Scollard Street in Toronto).” (Matulic Archive)

How Norval communicated his “support” is part of Sinclair’s “sham-man-istic” mystery; he’d been dead for a year, at least…

Norval Morrisseau, apparently speaking from the “Happy Hunting Ground,” told Ritchie Sinclair to “go ahead, use my name however you want…”

In fact Sinclair is totally, in every way, simply a white Indian imposter/impersonator trying to appropriate a uniquely ethno-cultural art form, which is among the very few in the world that is totally a one-of-a-kind Canadian Indian invention, and a mode of cultural expression entirely their own.

Unlike French Impressionism, the Canadian Group of Seven, the Surrealists, etc. the Woodland AKA Anishinaabe school of art is DNA centered – unique to Canadian First Nations who alone, created this novel mode of artistic expression. Period. Totally without the help of white self-promoters like Ritchie Sinclair.

Just like a man, no matter how many girdles and silk stockings he puts on, can never become a legitimate stand-in, or be a believable spokesperson for what it is like to be a woman, so no white artist – like Sinclair – can ever stand in for Canadian Indians and claim to be a legitimate voice of the Anishinaabe school of painting.

It is why art collectors will not buy Inuit art made by white men, African drums made in China, or Woodland (Anishinaabe) art made by Ritchie Sinclair. He will always be a white dude in downtown Toronto, no matter how many Indian names he appropriates, or how often he dresses up in his Davy Crockett buckskin jacket, and mumbles Indian chants and mumbo-jumbo to try to disguise the fact that he not only lacks the DNA, but the entire cultural and historical background that gives the school its cachet and resonance for collectors.

Grrrrh… Kinsman Robinson Galleries has pointedly refused to recognize Ritchie Sinclair as an artist of any standing, at all, by consistenly refusing to represent his art. The owners clearly value him as an “enforcer” they can use to promote their Conspiracy Theory, and dismiss him as a painter of any value. The realization is enough to make a guy, kept standing outside, looking in, howl his outrage, and want to throttle somebody…

Sinclair has used his Indian disguise for years, just to try to sell his art. Without success; it could never be otherwise.

Hell, everyone knows that “Stardreamer” is only a “Daydreamer” pursuing a totally dead end art form for him, as a white man.

We have so far failed to find a gallery that shows his Indian art. Here are some of the galleries who have definitely turned him down, and declined his request to become an agent for selling his art: Kinsman Robinson Galleries, Liss Gallery, and Artworld of Sherway.

It could make a guy sort of angry; very angry… and sort of want to strike out…

In 2004 numerous works of his – many were giant panels of original art – went to auction, after being sold off for nonpayment of storage locker fees – in Port Hope, Ontario. They sold for $25, $55, and $65 each.

People will pay more for a crappy washstand than for Ritchie Sinclair paintings.

At an auction Ritchie Sinclair testified was only “a third-tier auction house,” people were still discerning enough to want to pay more for a crappy washstand than for Ritchie Sinclair paintings.

The lesson for an artist: there's more money to be made as an "enforcer" than an artist.

The lesson for an artist: there’s more money to be made as a Conspiracy Theorist “enforcer” than an artist.

The Indian art by a white man that nobody wanted in the dying days of the Lane Gallery.

$30 Anybody…? The Indian art by a white man that nobody wanted in the dying days of the Lane Gallery.

In 2010 we visited the Lane Gallery – a neighbor of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries – just weeks before it went bankrupt.

In its front window it boasted an exhibition of Ritchie Sinclair’s art.

When we inquired, as interested customers, from the gallery owner, about the background of the artist, Ritchie Sinclair, was he white or what?

He replied, “Oh no, he’s of Aboriginal background.”

Now where would a gallery owner learn that except from the artist who provided him his fabricated bio along with his paintings?

Sinclair had already told Court Judge MD Godfrey, that he was an Indian artist. So here we are again…

This is the second gallery we know of, that Sinclair closed down when he was the featured artist.

The first was the Scollard Gallery, in October 2008, where he first tied his name to that of Norval Morrisseau.

If Norval was speaking from beyond – as Sinclair seems to imply – was he sending Sinclair a message?

Like maybe: “close the show Ritchie; cut the crap…”

Sinclair’s exhibitions have been the death knell for two galleries we know of. When they start showing Canadian Indian art by a white man, they are in their death throes. It’s not rocket science. No serious collector of any kind wants the stuff.

The Scollard Gallery, which closed permanently, shortly after Sinclair’s show opened, posted a fond farewell notice on the internet, thanking a long list of artists it was proud to have been associated with over the years.

Ritchie Sinclair the white Indian imposter/impersonator is not among them.

Within a matter of hours of the closing of his Scollard show Sinclair went ballistic, launching numerous physical assaults against neighbouring Morrisseau dealer Joe McLeod, yelling that he was going “to take down the whole Morrisseau market.”

The police later arrested him and charged him for multiple instances of Criminal Harassment of 80 year-old McLeod, on the street, at Joe’s car, his place of business, and his home. Once even setting off the burglar alarm, at 2:00 in the morning.

  • Sinclair then put up his notorious malicious website which has done more to destroy valuations in Canadian Indian art than anything since the Canadian government attacked the art and cultural regalia associated with the potlatch of the Kwakwaka’wakw ceremonies at Alert Bay, BC in the 1920s.

Sinclair is in good company, with a long list of other bad white dudes who have gone out of their way to make Canada an unhappy and inhospitable place for people of Aboriginal background.

Posted in Art Cartel, Art Galleries, Court Cases, Perjury or Dementia

Probing Perjury 3

sign_honest_truth_orRitchie Sinclair claims:

– to be a member of the NMHS (Norval Morrisseau Heritage Society)

“The victim in this matter, Richie Sinclair, is a protégé of the late Canadian artist, Norval Morrisseau. He also goes by the name “Stardreamer.” The victim is a member of the NMHS (Norval Morrisseau Historical (sic) Society.) ” (Police Document taking down statement by Ritchie Sinclair)

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a well-known white Canadian Indian imposter/impersonator.

Ritchie Sinclair is a longtime acolyte and business associate of Donald Robinson of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries, where he has been a private dinner guest, made video presentations, done guided tours, been praised in KRG blogs, thanked as an authority in Donald Robinson’s “expert” reports, etc. They have been “tag team” partners, and the only witnesses on the losing side, in several court cases (Otavnik v Sinclair 2010, Hatfield v Child 2012) where they have sought, unsuccessfully, to convincingly represent the Conspiracy Theorist position. (The partners have already agreed to join up for more joint court performances in 2013).

My Take: Perjury, Delusion or Dementia?

Ritchie Sinclair’s claim to the police as noted above is a total lie.

He has never been a member of the NMHS, founded in 2005, as an “outreach” branch plant of Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries.

In fact in Criminal Harassment charges, filed by the police against Sinclair for repeatedly, physically threatening the 80 year old Joseph McLeod, at his car, in the street, at his place of business, and setting off the burglar alarm at his home, one of his accompanying verbal outbursts was Sinclair’s anger that he had NOT been invited by Donald Robinson to become a member of the NMHS.

As a result of which he threatened that “he would take down the whole Morrisseau market,” as testified by Joe McLeod.

Sinclair’s academic record is somewhere between spotty to non-existent, him having spent only a few months at a community college introductory level commercial art course before dropping out around 1980, (testimony to Defence Counsel Brian Schiller) and so not qualifying for any certificate or diploma of any kind.

“Q. And what did that course qualify you to do?
A. Qualified me to do typeset; set-up; advertising; letter-set; very basic things that nobody uses any more.” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 23, 2012 p 124)

Donald Robinson huffily testified about the quality of people he wanted in the NMHS.

“THE COURT: Your reference to the initials N-M-H-S, again, please?
A. Norval Morrisseau Heritage Society.
MR. SCHILLER: Q. Is Ritchie Sinclair a member of that society?
A. No. The Society has respected academic people in the, in their, in their (sic) grouping; people from galleries, national institutions, for the most part.
Q. Okay.” (Court Trans/Hatfield v Child: Feb 23, 2012 p 46)

So much for Sinclair’s supposed membership in an elite – however wrong-headed and misguided – group of Ottawa-based academics!

But, hey, Canada is a free speech society, and everyone can say anything, no matter how ludicrous, apparently pretty well anywhere, including to the police, and in court, under oath.

And not have to worry about being penalized for it…

Posted in Art Cartel, BDPs - Black Drybrush Signed Painting, Court Cases, Forensic Expert Findings, Perjury or Dementia