Morrisseau-Related Court Cases
Summary: There have been eight (8) court cases (5 completed – 3 pending) dealing with the issue of supposed Morrisseau forgeries, from 2006 til 2013. Many of these cases featured Conspiracy Theorist Proxies – hapless, ignorant, gullible, trusting, neophyte art collectors who became the manipulated tools of Conspiracy Theorists.
The five completed court cases were ALL victories AGAINST the claims of the Conspiracy Theorists and their Proxies, that the paintings at issue, were forgeries.
Astonishingly, in two cases the Conspiracy Theorists actually begged for out-of-court settlements, resulting in them having to pay huge financial awards after forensic scientists ruled that the paintings they had defamed, were, in actual fact, with DNA certainty, authentically signed works by Norval Morrisseau.
More astonishingly the first case resulted the artist himself, Norval Morrisseau, having to pay a huge cash settlement for a false claim of forgery.
The second, even larger award went against the Globe and Mail and the false claims of their top Arts journalist.
In the other cases, all the allegations of forgery were massively overturned when three different top Canadian forensic scientists ruled the paintings in question and alleged to be fakes, were, in fact, authentically signed by Norval Morrisseau, and that no one else could have done so.
The forgery allegations in the Hatfield case, which last heard testimony in June 2012, has not even been dignified with a finding by the judge. It was to have been rendered on Sept. 25, 2012. As of March 2013, he has declined to even recognize the Plaintiff’s claim with a finding. The painting at issue has also been forensically authenticated as signed by Morrisseau.
The Hearn case, another attempt by the Conspiracy Theorists to get a neophyte art collector – Kevin Hearn of the Bare Naked Ladies – to become Proxy #5, and use his money to advance their bogus allegations, has stalled in the courts as the word is spreading that A Gigantic Hoax is underway, and Hearn is just the latest victim who will lose scores of thousands of dollars in a court case he can never, ever, hope to win.
The science, the facts, and history, is against him.
ASTONISHING BUT TRUE – Not in the 13 years, and counting, since Donald Robinson announced in the National Post, on May 18, 2001, that he had supposedly discovered thousands of Morrisseau forgeries, by umpteen forgers, has he, or any of his white business partners surrounding Norval’s wheelchair, ever taken a single forger or forgery to the police, or the courts… Ever…
And when they had the chance to lay their proof for forgers and forgeries out before a judge, they ran, like hell, for the exit… and paid people off, rather than facing a judge in court.
SHOCKING BUT TRUE – Not once, in the last 13 years of his life, did Norval Morrisseau, the man credited by all the white businessmen surrounding his wheelchair, with starting the Conspiracy Theory of “thousands of forgeries by umpteen forgers,” ever take a single forger, or forgery, person or business, to court for any reason whatsoever.
MORE SHOCKERS, BUT TRUE – The RCMP, after spending millions of dollars over several years, investigating the Robinson allegations of “thousands of forgeries by umpteen forgers” closed its investigation without charging a single person, or business, either with making forgeries, or for selling forgeries… end of story…
COMPARE – When Canadian master forger Richard McClintock (Glossary) tried to sell only two (2) forgeries in Montreal, he was immediately arrested, convicted, and sentenced by a judge.
MORE SHOCKING, BUT TRUE – Not once, in the 13 years since they “discovered” the thousands of forgeries by umpteen forgers, have Donald and Paul Robinson taken a single person to court, not for making forgeries, or for selling forgeries, even though they have publicly accused many decent people and reputable businesses of being involved…
UNBELIEVABLY SHOCKING BUT TRUE – DONALD & PAUL ROBINSON “SHOOTING THE MESSENGER” – After 13 years of never going after a single forger or forgery in the courts, the owners of the Kinsman Robinson Galleries of Toronto, have finally started to go to court, but only to launch vile SLAPP suits (Glossary) to “shoot” investigative journalists researching exactly what, and who, is behind the Conspiracy Theory of “thousands of forgeries, by umpteen forgers.”
Can anyone figure out why they would possibly do this…?
Table of Contents of Posts to come:
The Conspiracy Theorists, Their Proxies & the Courts
1 – 2001 – The Strange Tale of the Missing Court Case
– Robinson v Randy Potter
2 – 2008 – The Conspiracy Theorists Lose Court Case Round #1
– Otavnik v Vadas & Morrisseau
3 – 2009 – The Conspiracy Theorists Lose Court Case Round #2
– Moniz v CTV Globemedia & “CT Proxy #2” Val Ross
4 – 2009 – The Conspiracy Theorists Utterly Shot Down in Court Case Round #3
– Joe McLeod, Jackie Bugera, James White, Donna Child, Sun Nam Kim v Ritchie Sinclair
5 – 2009 – The Conspiracy Theorists Lose Court Case Round #4
– “CT Proxy #3” Browne v Bugera
6 – 2011 – The Conspiracy Theorists Lose Court Case Round #5
– Otavnik v Sinclair
7 – 2013 – The Conspiracy Theorists Lose Court Case Round #6
– “CT Proxy #4” Hatfield v Child
After a five day trial over two years, Deputy Judge Paul Martial was to announce his findings on Sep. 25, 2012, but refused to do so, on that date or in the five months and counting since. By not ruling he signaled that he refused to recognize the Plaintiff’s Claim that Artworld of Sherway had sold her a forgery. He further refused to rule that the painting “Wheel of Life 1979” is a fake, or indeed, damaged by the allegations which he refused to dignify with a reply. Under Court Rules he never needs to rule. So rendering the lawsuit and the reasons for launching it null and void.
It is his way of saying that “Wheel of Life 1979,” is an authentic Morrisseau and the Plaintiff’s claim fraudulent.
8 – 2013 – The Conspiracy Theorists Try Court Round #7
– “CT Proxy 5” Hearn v McLeod
Why would anyone want to shoot the messenger…?
The SLAPP Suit
Bonus Feature: “The Case of the Missing Paintings”